polyautography Antonyms
No Synonyms and anytonyms found
Meaning of polyautography
polyautography (n.)
The act or practice of multiplying copies of one's own handwriting, or of manuscripts, by printing from stone, -- a species of lithography.
polyautography Sentence Examples
- Polyautography, the act of writing under multiple pseudonyms, is a common practice among anonymous online authors.
- The professor's polyautography confused students, as they struggled to determine which papers came from the same mind.
- Despite the anonymity afforded by polyautography, the writer's distinctive style often betrays their true identity.
- The polyautography of some historical figures has hindered historians from fully understanding their contributions.
- The rise of social media has made polyautography easier than ever, allowing individuals to create and maintain multiple online identities.
- Polyautography can be used for various purposes, from artistic expression to escaping persecution or promoting a particular agenda.
- The ethical implications of polyautography are complex, as it raises questions about deception and the nature of authorship.
- Some writers use polyautography to explore different aspects of their own identity or to create fictional characters that they can inhabit.
- In certain contexts, polyautography can be a powerful tool for exposing wrongdoing or challenging the status quo.
- While polyautography has been practiced for centuries, its use and significance continue to evolve in the digital age.
FAQs About the word polyautography
The act or practice of multiplying copies of one's own handwriting, or of manuscripts, by printing from stone, -- a species of lithography.
No synonyms found.
No antonyms found.
Polyautography, the act of writing under multiple pseudonyms, is a common practice among anonymous online authors.
The professor's polyautography confused students, as they struggled to determine which papers came from the same mind.
Despite the anonymity afforded by polyautography, the writer's distinctive style often betrays their true identity.
The polyautography of some historical figures has hindered historians from fully understanding their contributions.
