cross-examination Antonyms
Strongest:
- interrogation
- grilling
- rehearing
- quiz
- challenge
- survey
- hearing
- poll
- question
- questionnaire
- reinvestigation
Strong:
- diagnosis
- self-scrutiny
- inspection
- self-examination
- query
- feeler
- investigation
- self-questioning
- self-reflection
- self-exploration
- research
- soul-searching
- inquiry
- examination
- inquest
- going-over
- audit
- questionary
- trial
Weak:
Meaning of cross-examination
cross-examination (n)
(law) close questioning of a hostile witness in a court of law to discredit or throw a new light on the testimony already provided in direct examination
cross-examination Sentence Examples
- The defense attorney began the cross-examination of the witness with a series of probing questions.
- During cross-examination, the prosecution sought to undermine the credibility of the defendant's alibi.
- The witness remained composed under intense cross-examination, sticking to their original testimony.
- The cross-examination revealed inconsistencies in the witness's account of the events.
- The judge allowed the defense attorney ample time for cross-examination to ensure a fair trial.
- The expert witness faced rigorous cross-examination regarding the validity of their scientific findings.
- The defendant's lawyer employed a strategic approach during cross-examination to cast doubt on the prosecution's case.
- Despite the prosecutor's aggressive cross-examination, the witness remained steadfast in their statements.
- The jury carefully considered the testimony given during cross-examination in reaching their verdict.
- The cross-examination exposed the flaws in the eyewitness's recollection of the incident.
FAQs About the word cross-examination
(law) close questioning of a hostile witness in a court of law to discredit or throw a new light on the testimony already provided in direct examination
interrogation,grilling, rehearing, quiz, challenge, survey, hearing, poll, question, questionnaire
No antonyms found.
The defense attorney began the cross-examination of the witness with a series of probing questions.
During cross-examination, the prosecution sought to undermine the credibility of the defendant's alibi.
The witness remained composed under intense cross-examination, sticking to their original testimony.
The cross-examination revealed inconsistencies in the witness's account of the events.