anti-federalist Sentence Examples
- The Anti-Federalist movement emerged during the ratification debates over the United States Constitution.
- Anti-Federalists expressed concerns about the concentration of power in a strong central government.
- Patrick Henry was a prominent Anti-Federalist who advocated for the inclusion of a Bill of Rights in the Constitution.
- Anti-Federalists argued that the Constitution lacked sufficient safeguards for individual liberties.
- The Anti-Federalist Papers, written by authors like George Mason and Mercy Otis Warren, provided detailed critiques of the proposed Constitution.
- Anti-Federalists were skeptical of a standing army, fearing it could be used to suppress the rights of the people.
- Anti-Federalists believed in a strict interpretation of the Constitution, advocating for states' rights.
- The Anti-Federalist position influenced the eventual addition of the Bill of Rights to address concerns about personal freedoms.
- Anti-Federalists warned that a strong central government might lead to tyranny and the loss of local autonomy.
- Despite their opposition, the Anti-Federalists played a crucial role in shaping the early American political landscape.
anti-federalist Meaning
anti-federalist (n.)
One of party opposed to a federative government; -- applied particularly to the party which opposed the adoption of the constitution of the United States.
Synonyms & Antonyms of anti-federalist
No Synonyms and anytonyms found
FAQs About the word anti-federalist
One of party opposed to a federative government; -- applied particularly to the party which opposed the adoption of the constitution of the United States.
No synonyms found.
No antonyms found.
The Anti-Federalist movement emerged during the ratification debates over the United States Constitution.
Anti-Federalists expressed concerns about the concentration of power in a strong central government.
Patrick Henry was a prominent Anti-Federalist who advocated for the inclusion of a Bill of Rights in the Constitution.
Anti-Federalists argued that the Constitution lacked sufficient safeguards for individual liberties.
