testimonial immunity Synonyms
No Synonyms and anytonyms found
testimonial immunity Meaning
testimonial immunity (n)
an exemption that displaces the privilege against self-incrimination; neither compelled testimony or any fruits of it can be used against the witness who therefore can no longer fear self-incrimination
testimonial immunity Sentence Examples
- Testimonial immunity, a legal privilege, safeguards witnesses from prosecution based on their testimony.
- The prosecutor sought to overturn the court's grant of testimonial immunity to the key witness.
- The judge ruled that the witness was entitled to testimonial immunity, as their testimony was essential for uncovering the truth.
- The defendant argued that the witness's immunity was overbroad and violated their confrontation rights.
- The appellate court upheld the lower court's decision, finding that the witness's testimony was sufficiently material and necessary to warrant immunity.
- The plaintiff requested testimonial immunity for the whistleblower, fearing retaliation if they testified publicly.
- The government's use of testimonial immunity to compel witnesses has been the subject of heated legal debate.
- Critics argue that testimonial immunity undermines the integrity of the justice system and protects potential wrongdoers.
- Supporters contend that it is a necessary tool to encourage individuals to come forward with vital information.
- The scope and application of testimonial immunity remains a complex and evolving legal issue.
FAQs About the word testimonial immunity
an exemption that displaces the privilege against self-incrimination; neither compelled testimony or any fruits of it can be used against the witness who theref
No synonyms found.
No antonyms found.
Testimonial immunity, a legal privilege, safeguards witnesses from prosecution based on their testimony.
The prosecutor sought to overturn the court's grant of testimonial immunity to the key witness.
The judge ruled that the witness was entitled to testimonial immunity, as their testimony was essential for uncovering the truth.
The defendant argued that the witness's immunity was overbroad and violated their confrontation rights.
