sciolist (Meaning)

Wordnet

sciolist (n)

an amateur who engages in an activity without serious intentions and who pretends to have knowledge

Webster

sciolist (n.)

One who knows many things superficially; a pretender to science; a smatterer.

Synonyms & Antonyms of sciolist

No Synonyms and anytonyms found

sciolist Sentence Examples

  1. The sciolist's superficial knowledge on a vast range of topics rendered him a source of amusement rather than respect.
  2. Despite his claims of vast scholarship, the sciolist's shallow understanding betrayed his ignorance.
  3. The historian pointed out the glaring errors in the sciolist's writings, exposing his superficial grasp of the subject matter.
  4. The scientist dismissed the sciolist's theories as mere platitudes, lacking any substantial scientific basis.
  5. The sciolist's glib remarks and lack of factual support made his opinions largely inconsequential.
  6. In the academic world, true scholars held sciolists in low regard, recognizing their penchant for superficiality.
  7. The sciolist's presence at the symposium was met with a collective eye roll, as scholars knew his contributions would be meaningless.
  8. The department chair cautioned against relying on the sciolist's research, citing his tendency to cherry-pick data to support his preconceived notions.
  9. The sciolist's arrogance masked his fundamental lack of knowledge, leading him to make bold claims that could not be substantiated.
  10. In the realm of discourse, the sciolist's shallow arguments were easily dismantled by those with genuine expertise.

FAQs About the word sciolist

an amateur who engages in an activity without serious intentions and who pretends to have knowledgeOne who knows many things superficially; a pretender to scien

No synonyms found.

No antonyms found.

The sciolist's superficial knowledge on a vast range of topics rendered him a source of amusement rather than respect.

Despite his claims of vast scholarship, the sciolist's shallow understanding betrayed his ignorance.

The historian pointed out the glaring errors in the sciolist's writings, exposing his superficial grasp of the subject matter.

The scientist dismissed the sciolist's theories as mere platitudes, lacking any substantial scientific basis.