ex postfacto Antonyms
No Synonyms and anytonyms found
Meaning of ex postfacto
ex postfacto ()
From or by an after act, or thing done afterward; in consequence of a subsequent act; retrospective.
ex postfacto Sentence Examples
- The school district's decision to expel the student was considered ex post facto, as it was based on an event that occurred after the student had already been accepted into the program.
- The law was ruled unconstitutional because it violated the ex post facto clause, which prohibits the government from retroactively punishing people for actions that were not illegal at the time they were committed.
- The law was passed and applied ex post facto, meaning it was in effect before the acts it was supposed to punish.
- Legislation that criminalizes conduct that was not illegal when committed is considered ex post facto, and is therefore unconstitutional.
- Retroactive laws, sometimes called ex post facto laws, are generally prohibited in the United States because they violate the due process clause of the Fifth Amendment.
- The court held that the new law could not be applied ex post facto to the defendant, because it would have increased the punishment for an offense that was already complete.
- The new tax law was ex post facto, as it applied to income earned before the law was passed.
- The court ruled that the ex post facto clause of the Constitution prohibits the government from applying a law retroactively to punish someone for an act that was not illegal when it was committed.
- The prohibition against ex post facto laws is intended to protect individuals from being punished for conduct that was not illegal when it occurred.
- The doctrine of ex post facto laws is based on the principle that individuals should not be punished for actions that were not illegal at the time they were committed.
FAQs About the word ex postfacto
From or by an after act, or thing done afterward; in consequence of a subsequent act; retrospective.
No synonyms found.
No antonyms found.
The school district's decision to expel the student was considered ex post facto, as it was based on an event that occurred after the student had already been accepted into the program.
The law was ruled unconstitutional because it violated the ex post facto clause, which prohibits the government from retroactively punishing people for actions that were not illegal at the time they were committed.
The law was passed and applied ex post facto, meaning it was in effect before the acts it was supposed to punish.
Legislation that criminalizes conduct that was not illegal when committed is considered ex post facto, and is therefore unconstitutional.
